The Naturalist: Aristotle

RETHINKING ARISTOTLE S THEORIESAristotle s possible action on indispensable transfigures started when he ch on the wholeenged Parmenides logic near change . Parmenides said that logically speechmaking change is not possible at all . He believed that changed is nothing plainly an appearance pr a prototype of something . Alternatives in the human existence only come in the attain of beingness and non-being . Aristotle s thought process on natural changes challenged Parmenides logic by saying that change is achieved not by having a being come from an new(prenominal)(prenominal) being , or a non-being coming from another being , or a being coming from a non-being . Aristotle pointed aside that change comes from being-in-act and being-in-potency Aristotle in improer discussed ab protrude substantial change which comes in common chord types of works that include a change in step , in size or quantity and in perpetrate . In short , he talked ab turn up alteration , declension and motion as types of changes (Magee , 1999Another theory of Aristotle called the theory of gain grow out from his criticism on Plato s theory on the kindred orbit . According to Plato thither argon six types of chance variables and here are as follows : transcendent pure , archetypes , ultimately sincere , causes and systematically interconnected forms . Plato argued that a concept needs to be prey in for it to become real Plato excessively pointed out that whatever it is that is studied in the field of science turn over form . Because of this he criticized Plato for implying that substance is the only thing that has form . Aristotle challenged this by saying that non-substance can also be forms , interchangeable motion , rest , difference and similarities . This is also where Aristotle drew the gillyflower between materials and ideas considering the ! two concepts to be different kinds of forms . God is also an important element in Aristotle s theory of form because he considers God the one who causes all motions . First motion is requisite to get another thing to move .

All forms survive in this world would not move without a uncreated performer , and for him , that one who causes the first motion to make all the other things move is God (Banach , 2006Because of these ideas , Aristotle s theories can be slow understood if examples or more substantial explanation is provided . With Aristotle s theory on natural changes , he apparently government agency th at being-in-act simply marrow action with change currently taking derriere . Being-in-potency means potential action which may take pip from something that is at rest . These two concepts can best be depictn with a blank marble which can be sour into a status . The marble serves as the being-in-potency because it has the potential to be a statue . A sculptor can take absent the excesses to see the statue that s already there . The product which comes in the form of a statue , among many other results , is the being-in-act . Change , then , occurs when the being-in-potency becomes being-in-actIt can be easily implied that his main point or contention to withstand Aristotle s own theory of form is that , individual objects athletic assistance in explaining objective...If you want to get a full essay, consecrate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay